Cristiano Ronaldo brands claims he raped American woman “fake news” as lawyers go after German mag
London, October 1, 2018 (AltAfrica)-Cristiano Ronaldo has denied raping an American woman – describing the allegation as “fake news”.
The Portuguese footballer addressed the accusations made by Kathryn Mayorga in an Instagram video on Sunday.
Ms Mayorga, 34, had told Der Spiegel that Ronaldo raped her in June 2009 in a Las Vegas hotel room.
The magazine reported that the two reached an out-of-court agreement which involved her remaining silent on the alleged rape and him paying her $375,000 (£275,000).
In his Instagram Live video, Ronaldo answered a question from a fan and said: “No, no, no, no, no – what they said today [is] fake, fake news.
“They wanna promote by my name, it’s normal.
“They wanna be famous to say my name, yeah, but it’s part of the job.
“I’m a happy man and all good.”
Spiegel reported that Ms Mayorga’s lawyer, Leslie Mark Stovall, has filed a civil complaint to declare the non-disclosure agreement void.
He told the magazine: “The purpose of this lawsuit is to hold Cristiano Ronaldo responsible within a civil court of law for the injuries he has caused Kathryn Mayorga and the consequences of those injuries.”
Ronaldo is one of the world’s most famous athletes. He has been named player of the year five times and recently completed a €100m (£89m) transfer to Juventus from Real Madrid.
The Italian club has declined to comment on the Der Spiegel report, but Ronaldo’s lawyer said he would seek legal redress from the magazine for reporting he described as “blatantly illegal”.
Christian Schertz said in a statement: “It violates the personal rights of our client Cristiano Ronaldo in an exceptionally serious way.
“This is an inadmissible reporting of suspicions in the area of privacy.
“It would therefore already be unlawful to reproduce this reporting.
“We have been instructed to immediately assert all existing claims under press law against Spiegel, in particular compensation for moral damages in an amount corresponding to the gravity of the infringement, which is probably one of the most serious violations of personal rights in recent years.”